Some comments I’ve made elsewhere on Harry and Meghan’s behaviour, and the Manchester child-grooming scandal being uncovered after 15 years this week, but still ignored by Meghan and her fans!
More theoretically, I ask: Did she have plans to use UK as link for African takeover of Europe; a pincer move between African Americans and Africans?
On last night’s Question Time:
Shami’s shame: Meghan’s silence on the mostly white children being racially groomed by mostly Muslim men was mirrored by Corbynista leader; Jeremy’s inner circle member Shami Chakrabarti; continuing a silence they’ve always had; neglecting their traditional voters, which probably contributed to the landslide election loss.
In a week when 15 years of cover-up were revealed in Manchester, it wasn’t a topic on Question Time last night. Meghan was, and Chakrabarti spoke passionately on ‘racism’ there.
When actor Laurence Fox said race had been used to stop the police investigating the child grooming, Chakrabarti was silent, and didn’t comment!
Comments on MSN article about it being a new cultural war:
It’s not a ‘new cultural war’: it’s a continuation of the old one, and Megxit is a ripple effect from Brexit.
If Corbyn had won the election and Brexit had been stopped Britain would have become more like Meghan wanted, and she’d have been well placed to win the battle versus the traditional royals.
If a Meghanista won the US presidency they could have used Britain as a link between USA and Africa.
In answer to a question about Meghan’s ambitions for world-changing, using UK as base for African Americans – Africa pincer move on Europe:
Going a bit into conspiracy theory there admittedly, but Meghan’s quite a hard-line ‘African-American’; Serena Williams’s right-hand woman. After the wedding, with her lone black mother (sitting alone despite apparently being offered a place with the ‘white’ royals) the only family member there, Meghan always did visits and photo opportunities with ‘women of colour’, ignoring poor whites like the grooming victims. Likewise her ‘charities’.
Her Vogue cover was full of ‘black power revolutionaries’.
The symbolic propaganda seemed to peak with the South Africa visit, where Archie was unveiled to the media with Tutu, a famous anti-Apartheid leader.
Archie’s godparents have remained secret: I think I know why, but could be wrong!
My posts here are usually ‘first drafts’, written on the spur of the moment, like spontaneous prose as promoted by Jack Kerouac from the 1940s and later; or inspired by previous thoughts offline. If I was writing articles or academic papers I’d edit them.
So for more clarity I’ve returned to a couple of recent posts. I do that for three reasons:
- It interests me and I want to examine it further.
- It could finally prove my genius!
- It shows I can still do academic quality research and writing.
Perfection Examined and Explained
Recently, I called this anagram box a perfect 3×3:
It is pefect in that the three words work horizontally and vertically, 3×3 two ways. So the 3×3 refers to the number of words and letters, rather than it working three ways.
There is also of course an extra EAT working backwards from position 9 to 1*, leading back to the start where it starts an EAT-TEA (acronymically and homophonically ET as in extra-terrestrial) horizontally (1 to 3*) and vertically (1 to 7*).
*Numbers 1-9 referred to above work:
So maybe 3x3x2+1 would be a more complete and accurate equation. 3×3 words and letters x 2 ways working (vertically and horizontally) and 1 working backwards diagonally.
Room for Improvement?
However, complete/contrary perfectionists may argue that to be perfect it should also work backwards and diagonally. While it couldn’t spell the same TEA-EAT-ATE words working backwards, it could conceivably spell different real words.
After the TEA-EAT-ATE anagram box:
I thought the related POT (teapot) might work as well, with OPT and TOP other words from those letters, but doesn’t work three-ways; only working two-ways from any combination:
Starting with TOP and OPT leaves PTO at the end; it is an acronym for Please Turn Over, but not a word:
Starting with OPT and POT leaves TTO:
Starting with POT and OPT also leaves TTO
I guess a word with two vowels might be needed. Do you know any others that work?
Leaving just one word each of tea-eat-ate creates a typical capital i shape, as in:
That letter (i) was of course the prime theme in my other letter wordplay (letterology!) post this week.
Even More Wordplay
Another EAT is created going backwards diagonally from square 9 to 1.
All three words can be fitted into five letters from nine in a cascading letters wave, for example, TEATE:
TEA, to start, then adding the other T for T(EAT), and then the other E for TE(ATE).
This works the other ways: EATEA (ATE and TEA added to EAT) and ATEAT (TEA and EAT added to ATE).
Happy Wordplay New Year!!!
¿ = I (i)
We are now in the second month of mistYmuse 2019/20 (#mYm2019), the four-months long zero carbon (maybe) longest festival ever!
My latest books, now in the shadow underground,
were more extensive examples of the new light above:
Sun sees sin s
o own our one so
ul universal udder.
(cos Santa’s on way!)
Prose book from my literary nonsense writing style period, before getting more classical with XaW Files: Beyond Humanity; and poetry book that mixed humour with seriousness (not available on Santa direct, so please don’t wish for them!).
mistYmuse’s (Most Ideal Sunrise Times – Midwinter Until Spring Equinox longest winter festival ever!) big day has arrived, with the sun having risen on the shortest day, and setting about seven hours and twenty-four minutes later. In Leeds, mistYmuse heartland, the times are 08.22 – 15.46.
Nice to see a good little BBC News report of the joyous occasion at Stonehenge with some ‘normal’ people/pagans. It seemed a very greenYgrey occasion, and not sure if there was some POP (PinkyOrangePurple) at sunrise!? Like last Wednesday:
Winter Solstice Philosophy
The mistYmuse might have provided this Winter Solstice philosophy; or my brain just thought of it!?
When I started writing I felt like a library of books…
now I feel edited into one interchangeable anagram… but still don’t know the letters!
A space analogy of the previous post would be a star imploding to black hole via supernova!
A technology analogy of yesterday’s posts would be a clunky original computer streamlined to microchip!
While I now consider myself an anagram of unknown letters (providing lots of ammunition for negatives, ha! ha!), I wonder if enlightened monks achieve singularity of letter, and know the letter, or go beyond letters altogether, to a blank space?